xanax dosages purchase xanax without a rx soma no a rxs needed COD 350 cheap generic mg soma cheapest phentermine us licensed pharmacies group cheap phentermine is tramadol hcl a narcotic tramadol effet secondaire diazepam persciptions tramadol mg tablet diazepam cialis compared viagra buying viagra in australia viagra from mexico cialis paraplegia cialis tadalafil lilly ambien cheap no a rx required canada no rx needed for purchasing ambien buy valium cod delivery valium on line buy fioricet and pay by cod how many fioricet daily can be taken free prescription meridia free shipping cheapest generic meridia state of ohio zithromax restrictions buy no prescription zithromax buy Adipex online pharmacies adipex dangers how to buy levitra online without a prescription levitra in mexico without prescriptin zolpidem by cod by zolpidem online for cod xanax cash delivery overnight buy generic xanax in uk online without a prescription buy generic soma no a rx order soma now phentermine 37.5 manufacturer phentermine obesity on yahoo health paroxetine hydrochloride tramadol order tramadol without prescription generic viagra pill cheapest viagra online in the uk cialis israel pharmacy india viagra cialis ambien online no a rx ambien online no prescription next day fedex shipping for valium valium drug interaction fioricet without prescription in Belfast fioricet without prescription in Greece cheap non prescription Meridia overnight Meridia saturday xanax dosages buy cheap prescription xanax soma fed ex soma online prescriptin no prescription no fee phentermine verycheap phentermine buy generic tramadol online akyma tramadol viagra herbal viagra cod buy cialis canada buy cialis viagra levitra samples ambien 10mg ambien without prescription cash on delivery where can i buy valium no prescription Valium how much can you take pictures of fioricet pills fioricet diet pills safe buy Meridia prescription online buy now Meridia
a radical queer blog space that defies spatial, physical, religious, gender, political and all other imposed boundaries
Random header image... Refresh for more!

Some Considerations for Taking QWB to the Next Level

On a local level QWB is quite a little phenomenon. We’ve had some startling successes and the character of the organization has remained uniquely positive since before we even took up the banner. As an amateur organizer, one thing I know is that success needs to be capitalized upon, otherwise the point becomes somewhat academic, though certainly not without value. So I have some arguments I’d like to make in favor of some directions for QWB to move in; I apologize in advance for making declarative statements, that’s just how I write oftentimes, and should be read as only my opinion and totally open to criticism.

With that in mind, there are a couple of areas where I feel QWB should consciously seek to grow. We are at a stage in Connecticut and elsewhere when the liberal Gay and Lesbian establishment is in retreat and the grassroots of the right-wing is mobilizing to destroy us and the gains we have won. And the crises of capitalism and imperialism are only escalating as the establishment clings to the band-aid remedies being handed down by the new regime. There is no apparent reason for hope, no sign of change in sight, but we most certainly are the ones we have been waiting for.

Cohering Our Collective

In the Hartford area, QWB should seek to become an organization of dozens of active members as a short-term goal. This will allow for a very wide distribution and contributions to our literature, queer voices in particular. It will also give us some muscle to mobilize around specific issues as we pick them or to respond to emergencies. But most importantly, it will bring in a broad number of people from different backgrounds and experiences, enriching our outlooks and collective identity, and infusing the collective with untold new energies.

Toward this end, meetings and events should be widely publicized through our contacts with GSA’s, F.A.D.G.E. fest, TransAdvocacy, People of Faith, the blog, literature (including specific meeting flyers) our email list and phone banking our contact list. Carpools should continue and be expanded as we become aware of the need from new people. The positions of facilitator and note taker should continue to be rotated, especially to new members, but they should also be provided with some written and spoken tips for effective facilitation. These somewhat exhaustive lengths should be assigned to a rotating “officer” or point-person position such as an organization secretary, and be backed-up by fallback people and assistants in the event of the officer being unable to fulfill these tasks. This kind of collective accountability is necessary to make a sustainable, participatory organization.

On a final note in this section, dues on a sliding-scale should be instituted to ensure a fair distribution of funds to the various areas of our activity. This will also give us the benefit of a treasury to draw from in times of need, such as in an instance where bail is needed, transportation costs need to be covered, or when funds are needed to produce literature, signs and banners in response to some emergency situation, such as a right-wing mobilization of some kind. The treasury should be maintained by a rotating treasurer position, who should report on the organization’s finances at each meeting, or delegate said responsibilities as needed.

Elaborating on Our Politics

QWB has a wealth of knowledge and experience to draw from, but we have put a small portion of that onto paper for others to appreciate and be inspired by. queer voices is one part of our effort to change that, which we should continue to do and improve upon. However, a brief statement of who we are, what we want and what we do would be a very useful document. The process of creating it would be a wonderful, creative collaborative effort, and making it available to prospective members would do much to draw in new members; I’m convinced that if everyone we’re trying to reach knew more about us, we would be inundated with new recruits.

Such a statement should cover some of the following areas:

  • What we’re in favor of: a free, egalitarian social order where consenting individuals and collectives may determine the content/form and number of their relationships.
  • What we oppose: violence and discrimination in our communities by bigots, bosses and the state against anyone regardless of their sexuality, disability, gender, ethnicity, race, beliefs or national origin.
  • Who we are: a collective of people with diverse backgrounds/identities and a variety of political outlooks.
  • What we do: we seek to build popular power at the grassroots to directly confront injustice/inequality and to create new literatory, inclusive cultures free of domination and ignorance. We fight for concrete improvements in the quality of life for all poor and working people, winning demands from the ruling class without collaborating with them.

Less jargon is always good, but that’s roughly what I think should be covered, and I hope will be expanded upon by everyone else.

Expanding the QWB Model Beyond Hartford

QWB is a fairly unique body, even outside of Connecticut. Most radical queer groups in the US seem to have a specific label or political orientation, generally a mish-mash of anarcha-feminism, post-leftism and radical queer theory. Bash Back! for example has harnessed that tendency into a network that is among the few national radical groupings that is regularly involved in militant activity and can mobilize effectively. However, because of the anti-organizational tendencies, super-militancy and insular counter-culture that one finds there and in related milieus, it is unlikely that BB! will prove sustainable, and will probably disappear within a couple years as a meaningful force. BB! however is emblematic of an overall positive direction for the queer left to be moving in, and we should all welcome opportunities to support and collaborate with their efforts.

QWB, on the other hand, is connected to but separate from the queer anarchist milieu, and we are in a position to offer a constructive program for others’ use. I believe our long-range goal should be to creative a radical queer mass organization out of the QWB model we are developing (by that or some other name) based upon a directly-democratic process and a federation structure.

This can start with the founding of QWB “chapters” around southern New England, through public speaking engagements, continued distribution of our literature, and a commitment to an anti-sectarian, inclusive organizational culture. (The name of such “chapters” in my opinion is a purely aesthetic consideration, and up to anyone who decides to start one.) QWB should develop a list of topics we feel we can speak about or discussions we can lead to give people in different cities a sense of what we can offer, and include them in a brochure to send out to other groups, bookstores, conference organizers, etc. 

11 comments

1 mark snyder { 04.21.09 at 4:17 pm }

It's great you are thinking about these things. At QueerToday we had many of the same discussions, as we were doing similar activism in Boston - and then going through a transition time. The Boston chapter made a huge impact over a span of 5 years or so, and now has fizzled some, but it is still loosely organized. Ultimately expanding online and letting people build their groups etc. was the decision.  It will take time to build up a network nationwide of similar queer activist groups, I hope to work with QWB as much as possible in the future :)

2 -a- { 04.21.09 at 8:00 pm }

Thanks for writing this Matt. I know theses are things you've been thinking about for a while because I remember you wanting to go in this direction during the Metroline debacle.

Should we have a meeting around this, since our first meeting in a while last year was meant to address this? Or do we have too many damn meetings [between QWB and everything else folks are involved in] already as it is? I really don't know anything about this stuff; I'm just the blog co-administrator.

3 m(A)tt { 04.21.09 at 8:29 pm }

Thanks Mark and Alvin.

I think we can discuss this at our next general business meeting, which is slated for May 3rd. In the mean time, let's hear lots of debate about this. I don't wanna meet and have everyone just nod their head or shrug!

4 -a- { 04.24.09 at 1:12 pm }

The lack of response to this post is saying a lot to me.

I just have a couple thoughts to contribute. There was a comment up here before that I thought advanced some good points; mainly that QWB is a pretty small group (which is, I'd like to add, in a pretty small city with a pretty small pool of activists). We're also a group of people stretched thin with multiple organizational commitments [in my case, personal limitations] and I think QWB is on many a member's back burner much of the time. The level of commitment current members are able to pledge needs to be realistically assessed.

What you're proposing is great Matt - I just don't know if Hartford can produce it right now despite the need for it. There may be greater fertility elsewhere. However I don't think we need to be in the forefront to support and contribute to the advent of something like this.

Anyone else have thoughts? Anyone else HERE?

5 m(A)tt { 04.24.09 at 2:30 pm }

Thanks for the comments. Deric was saying much the same thing the other day when I was asking him about this. I think that even when we're at the top of our game, everything you're saying is true. But, I don't consider our current lull to be anything more than a swing of the pendulum.

I think that most of the stuff I've outlined is actually quite doable, or at least can be initiated by a meeting with a modest turnout. When folks see that something is being worked on, like a collaborative piece of writing, there is a tendency to jump into the mix and make a contribution. Activity is itself one form of advertisement. That's one short-term thing we can do. Another one is adequate publicity for our next meeting, May 3rd at Charter Oak at 5PM.

Much of our core group is, as you say, wrapped up in other organizational work and personal commitments. But 20 minutes of making phone calls to the usual suspects and people who have signed up for more info could probably have an impact.

It's all about getting the ball rolling, and staying patient despite our demoralization.

6 CatMushroom { 04.25.09 at 8:37 pm }

I've never understood supporting freedom of belief while oppossing bigotry (I've been thinking about this for over 10 years now!). For me, I have a long history of experiencing exclusion and not being welcome (at least not safely) in many spaces. And also, I worry about advocating for the rights of those who are not amongst us. Solidarity sounds great, but do we really know what other peoples needs are? What might the unintended consequences be, for them, if we mess up? I still can't get over how the Mychigans Wymyns Music Festival (for an example) thinks they speak for all women when they talk. I guess it all comes down to a question for me: Are we (QWB) diverse enough to understand something that the majority of us (QWB) are clueless about? I think that we just might be, and that's damn cool!

7 deric { 04.25.09 at 11:41 pm }

I'm here, Alvin!! Just staying quiet for once! =)

8 abbey volcano { 04.27.09 at 9:04 am }

Honestly, I'd just rather discuss this in person at the meeting on Sunday, which I'll be pretty late to.

9 abbey volcano { 04.27.09 at 9:07 am }

Oh, also, I didn't mean it shouldn't be discussed online, just rather that I prefer talking in person. Sorry, meant to make that more clear.

10 jerimarie { 05.04.09 at 8:16 am }

excellent proposal and thinking matt and the discussion at the qwb meeting helped bring this into focus.  qwb has been an organic group that is critically necessary in the staid state of CT and this provides a vehicle for that evolution.  the tough part though important part is now crystallizing a consensus around these ideas.

11 m(A)tt { 05.04.09 at 9:36 pm }

Tough? Meh, I suppose. I think for any other group in the area it would be a pretty ridiculously difficult undertaking, but I think given a) our common politics, and b) more importantly, we all get along exceedingly well, and the process will only mean growth for each of our respective politics, and the politics of the collective as a whole.

Leave a Comment

58304 pages viewed, 168 today
19751 visits, 65 today
FireStats icon Powered by FireStats